<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMS Council Agenda: July 14, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ubcinsiders.ca/2010/07/ams-council-agenda-july-14-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ubcinsiders.ca/2010/07/ams-council-agenda-july-14-2010/</link>
	<description>Separating the wheat from the chaff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy</title>
		<link>http://ubcinsiders.ca/2010/07/ams-council-agenda-july-14-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-10200</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubcinsiders.ca/?p=6567#comment-10200</guid>
		<description>some coordinators make good money... lucky people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some coordinators make good money&#8230; lucky people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://ubcinsiders.ca/2010/07/ams-council-agenda-july-14-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-10199</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubcinsiders.ca/?p=6567#comment-10199</guid>
		<description>I don’t remember how many times I tried to make the point last year that the fear of financial crisis in the AMS was merely fabricated as an excuse to cut progressive programs, including the Safety and Equity offices. It’s an obvious trick that’s used by politicians all the time. Now you can clearly see that the real motivation for the cuts was even worse – to increase the financial benefits for executives. Even Tom Dvorak last year advocated against such foolish and selfish measures. I thought that one effect I might have left on the AMS was to create a Council that viciously scrutinizes the activities and motivations of the executive. Councilors, however, are apparently more intent on making the AMS even less relevant to students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t remember how many times I tried to make the point last year that the fear of financial crisis in the AMS was merely fabricated as an excuse to cut progressive programs, including the Safety and Equity offices. It’s an obvious trick that’s used by politicians all the time. Now you can clearly see that the real motivation for the cuts was even worse – to increase the financial benefits for executives. Even Tom Dvorak last year advocated against such foolish and selfish measures. I thought that one effect I might have left on the AMS was to create a Council that viciously scrutinizes the activities and motivations of the executive. Councilors, however, are apparently more intent on making the AMS even less relevant to students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
