<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Month Sober, What&#8217;s Next for Koerner&#8217;s?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ubcinsiders.ca/2010/05/a-month-sober-whats-next-for-koerners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ubcinsiders.ca/2010/05/a-month-sober-whats-next-for-koerners/</link>
	<description>Separating the wheat from the chaff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lougheed</title>
		<link>http://ubcinsiders.ca/2010/05/a-month-sober-whats-next-for-koerners/comment-page-1/#comment-9940</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lougheed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 06:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ubc.ca/ubcinsiders/?p=3005#comment-9940</guid>
		<description>The problem with subcontracting is that no one will take it up.
I&#039;m fairly certain the AMS pubs are a net loser if they were paying market rent for the space they occupy. I imagine the same would occur if the place was run by UBCFS, given they&#039;d have to deal with union wages, ancillary levies, and their relative unfamiliarity with this particular demographic (though I&#039;ve yet to scope out The Point Restaurant).
None of this looks good for anyone. Personally, I&#039;d love for the Law Students&#039; Society to take over control of the pub. They&#039;re already reasonable share of the patronage, and are mature, responsive, and responsible (heck, Law Students started the Save Koerners group). This would also give Futurners a distinct &#039;flavour&#039; from that of an AMS/UBCFS establishment.
The only problem with everything here is the bottom line. I imagine students would be up to toss a couple of bucks annually for a worthwhile watering hole. Beats A/V and classrooms, that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with subcontracting is that no one will take it up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fairly certain the AMS pubs are a net loser if they were paying market rent for the space they occupy. I imagine the same would occur if the place was run by UBCFS, given they&#8217;d have to deal with union wages, ancillary levies, and their relative unfamiliarity with this particular demographic (though I&#8217;ve yet to scope out The Point Restaurant).</p>
<p>None of this looks good for anyone. Personally, I&#8217;d love for the Law Students&#8217; Society to take over control of the pub. They&#8217;re already reasonable share of the patronage, and are mature, responsive, and responsible (heck, Law Students started the Save Koerners group). This would also give Futurners a distinct &#8216;flavour&#8217; from that of an AMS/UBCFS establishment.</p>
<p>The only problem with everything here is the bottom line. I imagine students would be up to toss a couple of bucks annually for a worthwhile watering hole. Beats A/V and classrooms, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
